PENALARAN KREATIF MATEMATIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.36131Keywords:
kreatif, matematika, penalaran, creative, mathematics, reasoningAbstract
Mathematics can be seen as a way of reasoning, because mathematics contain valid way of proving, as well as the systematic nature of mathematical reasoning. Reasoning ability is one of the competencies required by learners. Mathematics and mathematical reasoning are two things that cannot be separated, the material is understood through reasoning and mathematical reasoning to understand and are trained through learning mathematics. In this article will discuss about one of the types of reasoning according to Lithner, creative reasoning. There are two types of reasoning that is often used by students in solving mathematical tasks: creative reasoning and imitative reasoning. Creative reasoning has four criteria: novelty, flexible, reasonable and mathematical foundation.
Matematika dapat dipandang sebagai cara bernalar, karena matematika memuat cara pembuktian yang sahih atau valid, serta sifat penalaran matematika yang sistematis. Kemampuan penalaran merupakan salah satu dari kompetensi yang harus dimiliki oleh peserta didik. Materi matematika dan penalaran matematika merupakan dua hal yang tidak dapat dipisahkan, materi matematika dipahami melalui penalaran dan penalaran dipahami dan dilatih melalui belajar materi matematika. Dalam artikel ini akan dibahas tentang salah satu jenis penalaran menurut Lithner, yaitu penalaran kreatif. Terdapat dua jenis penalaran yang sering digunakan siswa dalam menyelesaikan tugas-tugas matematika, yaitu: Creative Reasoning (Penalaran Kreatif) dan Imitatif Reasoning (Penalaran Imitatif). Penalaran kreatif mempunyai empat kriteria, yaitu: kebaruan (novelty), fleksibel (flexibility), masuk akal (plausible) dan berdasar matematis (mathematical foundation).
Downloads
References
Adams, J.W. (2007). Individual differences in mathematical ability: genetic, cognitive and behavioural factors. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs Volume 7 Number 2 page 97–103
Bervqvist, T., Lithner, J., and Sumpter, L. (2002). Reasoning Characteristics in Upper Secondary School Students’ Task Solving. Artikel : [On line]. Tersedia
Berqvist, E. (2007). Types of Reasoning Required in Univesity Exams in Mathematics. Artikel: [On line]. Tersedia
Boesen, J. (2007). Why Emphasise Imitative Reasoning? Teacher-made Test. Departemen of Mathematics Umea University.
Lithner, J. (2006). A Framework for Analysing Creative and Imitative Mathematical Reasoning. Artikel: [On line]. Tersedia:
Palm, T., Boesen, J., and Lithner, J. (2006). The Requirements of Mathematical Reasoning in Upper secondary Level Assessments
Permana, Y., dan Sumarmo, U. (2007). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Koneksi Matematik Siswa SMA Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Educationist: Vol 1 No.2 hal 116-123
Polya, G. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Volume 1
Raimi, R. (2002). Part 2 of A Mathematical Manifesto NYC HOLD. Online. Tersedia: http://nychold.com/raimi-reason02.html
Steen, L.A. (1999). Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 270-285.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
