DAMPAK PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI BERJENJANG DALAM MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN MENULIS ARGUMENTATIF CALON GURU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36238Keywords:
calon guru biologi, inkuiri berjenjang, tulisan argumentatif, argumentative writing, pre-service biology teachers, hierarchy of inquiryAbstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate biology teacher candidates’s argumentative writing skill after they participated in hierarchy of inquiry learning. The participants of this action research are the 4th semester students of Biology Teacher Education Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University who took the course of Plant Embryology. Data were analyzed descriptively through interviews with experts, classroom observations, and student portfolios. The argumentative writing was measured using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) with four kinds of argument elements, which include data, warrants, backings, and claims. The results showed that the argumentative writing skill was increased, in every aspect and levels of inquiry. Biology teacher candidates who had well-experienced in the hierarchy of inquiry outperformed argumentative writing skill, thus it can be concluded that Hierarchy of Inquiry Learning is suitable in fostering teacher candidates to do some inquiry activities, and positively impacted argumentative writing skill.
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengevaluasi kemampuan menulis argumentatif calon guru biologi meningkat setelah mereka mendapatkan pembelajaran inkuiri berjenjang. Partisipan dalam penelitian tindakan kelas ini adalah mahasiswa semester 4 di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta yang menempuh mata kuliah Embriologi Tumbuhan. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif melalui wawancara, pengamatan kelas dan portofolio. Kemampuan menulis diukur menggunakan Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) yang meliputi empat komponen, yaitu data, warrants, backings, dan claims. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada akhir siklus kedua terjadi peningkatan skor keterampilan berpikir argumentatif pada setiap aspeknya di semua tingkatan jenjang inkuiri. Calon guru biologi yang telah berpengalaman dalam inkuiri berjenjang menunjukkan kemampuan menulis argumentasi yang lebih baik sehingga disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran dengan inkuiri berjenjang sesuai diterapkan untuk mendukung berbagai aktivitas inkuiri dan meningkatkan kemampuan menulis argumentatif.
Downloads
References
Acar, O., & Patton, R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in An Argumentation-based Guided Inquiry Course. Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 46, hlm. 4756 – 4760.
Berland, L., & Katherine L. McNeill. 2009. Using a Learning Progression to Inform Scientific Argumentation in Talk and Writing. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA.
Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth : Heinemann. hlm. 56-67.
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and suhlmort the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa Vol. 20, hlm. 99-108.
Duschl, A. (2012) The Second Dimension Crosscutting Concepts Understanding A Framework for K–12 Science Education. Science & Children, Vol. 49 No.6, hlm. 10-14.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. in Denzin, N and Lincoln, Y. The Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Levy, Y. & Ellis, T. (2006). A Systems Ahlmroach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Suhlmort of Information Systems Research. Informing Science Journal Vol 9, hlm. 181-212.
Memis, E.K., & Oz., M. (2014). The Impact of Inquiry Process on the Cognitive Process Dimensions of Nontraditional Writing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science Vol. 5 No.20, hlm. 38 – 47.
National Science Teacher Assocation. (2007). Principles of Professionalism for Science Educators Principles of Professionalism for Science Educators. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science : The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, Vol. 328, hlm. 463-466.
Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S., Kamp, E., Manoli, C., Zacharia, Z., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review Vol. 14 No.1, hlm. 47–61.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms ,J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas. The Science Education. Vol. 97 No.5, hlm. 643–670.
Saracaloglu, A. S., Aktamis, H., & Delioglu, Y. (2011). The Impact of The Development of prospective Teacher’s Critical Thinking Skill on Scientific Argumentation Training and on Their Ability To Construct an Argument. Journal of Baltic Science Education Vol. 10 No.4, hlm. 243-260.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press. hlm. 89-95, 114-118.
Wenning, C. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online Vol. 6 No.2, hlm. 9-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
