ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT LEARNING AND ITS VARIOUS TYPES OF ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Tony Hadibarata Curtin University Malaysia Author
  • Achmad Syafiuddin Curtin University Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v23i1.8930

Keywords:

critical thinking, learning experience, oral assessment, student perception, written-assessment

Abstract

Students’ perception of assessments can serve as a guiding light for improving overall educational practices. A questionnaire was collected from 80 engineering student to discover students' perceptions of different types of assessment and their overall perceptions of various type of assessments advantages in enhancing learning experiences. The majority of students strongly agreed that quiz and case study was beneficial and helpful for enhancing learning experience in engineering courses. On the contrary, project presentation, journal review, essay, interview, and demonstration was seemed unhelpful for students to enhance their learning experience. In terms of enjoyment, a discrepancy was found for what engineering students’ perceived as important assessment tools for learning and what they actually enjoy doing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Tony Hadibarata, Curtin University Malaysia

    Department of Environmental Engineering
    Faculty of Engineering and Science,

  • Achmad Syafiuddin, Curtin University Malaysia

    Department of Environmental Engineering
    Faculty of Engineering and Science,

References

Artwe, J. (1997). Using assessment as a tool for learning, In R. Blum & J. Arter (Eds.), Student performance assessment in an era of restructuring (pp. 1‐6). Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd ed). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Dochy, F. J. R. C. & Mcdowell, L. (1997) Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279‐298.

Dochy, Y, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self‐, peer and co‐assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331‐350.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self‐assessment in higher education: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.

Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: a test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 125-136.

Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The Adult Learner (6th ed). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Malpas, R. S. (2000) The Universe of Engineering – A UK Perspective, London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.

O’Neil, G., & Mcmahon, T. (2005). Student‐centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neil, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27‐36). Dublin: AISHE.

Savin-Baden, M. (2003) Facilitating Problem-based Learning: the other side of silence, Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press

Sivan, A., Wong Leung, R., Woon, C. & Kember, D. (2000) ‘An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning’, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 381–389.

Uhles, N., Weimer-Elder, B., & Lee, J.G. (2008). Simulation game provides financial management training. Healthcare Financial Management, 62, 82–88.

Published

30-04-2018

How to Cite

ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT LEARNING AND ITS VARIOUS TYPES OF ASSESSMENT. (2018). Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v23i1.8930