About the Journal

The Jurnal EurekaMatika promotes research in the broad field of Mathematics (Algebra, Analysis, Statistics, and Applied Mathematics) with particular respect to Indonesia, but not limited to authorship or topical coverage within the region.

Contributions are expected from senior researchers, project managers, research administrators and PhD students at advanced stages of their research, representing both public organizations and private industry. Equally, the journal if intended for scholars and students, reseachers working at research organizations and government agencies, and also for enterprises undertaking applied R&D to lead innovations.

The editorial contents and elements that comprise the journal include:

  • Theoretical articles
  • Empirical studies
  • Practice-oriented papers
  • Case studies
  • Review of papers, books, and resources.

As far as the criteria for evaluating and accepting submissions is concerned, a rigorous review process will be used. Submitted papers will, prior to the formal review, be screened so as to ensure their suitability and adequacy to the journal. In addition, an initial quality control will be performed, so as to ensure matters such as language, style of references and others, comply with the journal´s style.

The below mentioned areas are just indicative. The editorial board also welcomes innovative articles that redefine any Mathematics, Science and Technology field.

  • Mathematics
  • Analysist
  • Theory Number
  • Algebra
  • Statistics
  • Crypthographic
  • Combinatorics
  • Discrete Mathematics
  • Numeric Methods

All papers are fully peer-reviewed.We only publish articles that have been reviewed and approved by highly qualified researchers with expertise in a field appropriate (at least two reviewers per article). We used double blind peer-reviewing process (The editor keeps the identities of both the author and the reviewers hidden throughout the process). Detailed information about the flow for the manuscript submission (author) to the acceptance by editor is shown in the following figure.

In short, the steps are:

  1. Manuscript Submission (by author) (route 1)
  2. Manuscript Check and Selection (by manager and editors) (route 2). Editors have a right to directly accept, reject, or review. The journal's editor decides whether the paper is a good fit for the journal and then selects reviewers. The editor keeps the identities of both the author and the reviewers hidden throughout the process. Prior to further processing steps, plagiarism check using turtitin is applied for each manuscript. 
  3. Manuscript Reviewing Process (by reviewers) (route 3-4). The reviewer reviews the paper, sends comments and recommendations to the editor, and returns the paper to the author with their comments. 
  4. Notification of Manuscript Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection (by editor to author based on reviewers comments) (route 5)
  5. Paper Revision (by author). The author is responsible for making any necessary changes based on the reviewer's comments and then resubmitting the paper.
  6. Revision Submission based on Reviewer Suggestion (by author) with similar flow to point number 1. (route 1).  This process is repeated until both reviewers agree that the paper is ready for publication.
  7. If reviewer seems to be satisfied with revision, notification for acceptance (by editor). (route 6)
  8. Galley proof and publishing process  (route 7 and 8)

The steps point number 1 to 5 is considered as 1 round of peer-reviewing process (see grey area in the figure). And, our reviewing process at least goes through 2 round of reviewing process.

 

The journal editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. The following are the most common decisions:

(i)   accept without any changes (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper in its original form

(ii)  accept with minor revisions (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper and asks the author to make small corrections

(iii) accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance ): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors

(iv)revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes

reject the paper (outright rejection): the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the authors make major revisions