Impact of DECODE model and STEM strategies on in-service teachers' professional development in Tamil Nadu, India

Authors

  • Rajasekaran P Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Josly Jose Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
  • Narmada Devi Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Data Curation
    • Investigation
  • Prawnya Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Investigation
    • Data Curation
  • Kapilas P Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
  • Sreedevi P.S Department of Education, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-DTBU Author
    • Supervision
    • Validation
  • Chun Yen Chang Institute of Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan , Department of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan , Graduate School of Education, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan , Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia Author
    • Supervision
    • Validation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.111.116

Keywords:

Critical thinking skills, STEM, In-service teachers, DECODE, Professional development, Technology.

Abstract

In the context of growing educational demands, continuous professional development has become essential for in-service teachers. This study investigates the impact of a professional development program based on the DECODE Model and STEM strategies aimed at enhancing critical thinking skills among 37 in-service science and mathematics teachers in Tamil Nadu, India. The intervention included hybrid-mode workshops facilitated by both Taiwanese and Indian experts, comprising three structured sessions: Demonstration, Co-teaching and Co-training, and Debrief. A validated 35-item rating scale was administered before and after the workshop to measure five stages of professional growth: knowledge base construction, model observation, practice reflection, implementation of changes, and expertise acquisition and dissemination. Results from a paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant improvement in participants’ professional development scores (t = -4.515, p < .001). The study concludes that the DECODE Model is an effective framework for empowering in-service teachers with innovative pedagogical skills and promoting reflective teaching practices in STEM education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2024). How to Empower Educators through Digital Pedagogies and Faculty Development Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4674876

Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st Century skills: Understanding the depth and width of the challenges to shape proactive teacher education programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097365

BADA, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. In IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp. 66–70) . https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670

Charania, A., Paltiwale, S., Sen, S., Sarkar, D., & Bakshani, U. (2023). Leading edge use of technology for teacher professional development in Indian schools. Education Sciences, 13(4), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040386

Cheng, P., Molina, J., Lin, M., Liu, H., & Chang, C. (2022). A new TPACK training model for tackling the ongoing challenges of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 5(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020032

Cheng, P., Molina, J., Lin, M., Liu, H., & Chang, C. (2022). A new TPACK training model for tackling the ongoing challenges of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 5(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020032

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3),181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward better conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08331140

Detert, J. R., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). A Culture Framework for Education: Defining quality values and their impact in U.S. high schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.12.2.183.3454

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Jannah, D. K. a. W., Handayani, R. D., & Wahono, B. (2025). The role of workshops using the DECODE online model in supporting STEM teachers’ TPACK competence in teaching inquiry skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 8(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v8i1.82493

Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Brown, K., Karibo, B., Scott, A., & Park, E. (2015). The Empowering Schools project. Youth & Society, 49(6), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x14566118

Labone, E., & Long, J. (2014). Features of effective professional learning: a case study of the implementation of a system-based professional learning model. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.948689

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z

Maspul, K. A. (2024). Enhancing Project-Based Learning in STEM Education with Integrated Technology and Coding. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Information Technology, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.61971/jisit.v1i1.20

Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

Rajasekaran, R., Sreedevi, P. S., & Chang, C. (2024). DECODE-based STEM workshop in improving academic resilience and teaching competency of pre-service teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2406. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14243

Roth, K. J., Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Stuhlsatz, M. a. M., & Hvidsten, C. (2018). Comparing the effects of Analysis-of-Practice and Content-Based professional development on teacher and student outcomes in science. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1217–1253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218814759

Sinha, S. & Karsten Krauskopf. (2025). Teacher Professional Development in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: Successful Models for Indian Educators to succeed in digital Classrooms. Indian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 257–259.

Smet, M. (2022). Professional Development and Teacher Job Satisfaction: Evidence from a Multilevel Model. Mathematics, 10(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010051

Sui, C., Yen, M., & Chang, C. (2024b). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching science with technology-enhanced self-regulated learning strategies through the DECODE model. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22813–22839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12715-x

Tang, S. Y. F., & Choi, P. L. (2009). Teachers’ professional lives and continuing professional development in changing times. Educational Review, 61(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910802684748

Wahono, B., Hariyadi, S., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). The development of an online STEM teacher professional development package with the DECODE model: An innovative teacher’s quality maintenance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2191. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12647

Wahono, B., Hariyadi, S., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). The development of an online STEM teacher professional development package with the DECODE model: An innovative teacher’s quality maintenance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2191. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12647

Yang, S. C., Hsueh, Y. H., & Hung, S. (2026). Interdisciplinary strategies in STE(A)M education: a critical analysis of curriculum and pedagogy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2026.2628601

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author

How to Cite

Impact of DECODE model and STEM strategies on in-service teachers’ professional development in Tamil Nadu, India. (2026). Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.111.116

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.